Mortgage Intelligence
Menu

Evaluate

Evaluate Mortgage Intelligence on mortgage work.

Use a synthetic, sample, de-identified, or appropriately controlled historical file. Compare the system's outputs against outcomes your team already understands. No NDA is required to start the conversation, no sales sequence, and nothing installed.

Request a working session

Two ways in

Start with our files, or with yours

Most people start with the first. It costs you nothing and shows you the same thing.

OPTION A
A synthetic file, no data from you
We run a synthetic loan file end to end and walk you through it: what was read from each document, which rules ran, which were skipped, what was flagged, and what a reviewer sees. You send us nothing. Use this to judge whether the evidence is the shape your auditors would accept.
OPTION B
Your files, de-identified, outcomes you know
Three to five closed files whose outcomes you already know, ideally including one that was cleared and should not have been. That is the most informative test there is, because you can check our findings against what actually happened. De-identified, redacted or otherwise controlled historical files only, under a mutual NDA.
WHAT YOU GET
The findings, and the working behind them
A walkthrough of each finding: the document and page each value came from, the rule version applied, the rules that did not run, and the exception as a reviewer would receive it. Plus an honest list of what the system did not catch.
WHAT WE ASK
Your form mix and one rule set
Which loan programs you run and which investor or agency requirements matter most. That is enough to configure a meaningful test.
HOW FILES REACH US
Delivered files. Nothing to build.
An evaluation needs no integration work: files are delivered into tracked processing sessions. Origination connectors, batch ingestion and mortgage data interfaces including ULDD are on the roadmap rather than available now.

The sequence

Eight steps, agreed before the session rather than argued afterwards

  1. 01

    Agree on file type, program and scope

    Which loan programs, which rule set, which documents.

  2. 02

    Agree on the privacy and security boundary

    What material is used, under what agreement, and where it is processed.

  3. 03

    Process the file

    Delivered into a tracked session and run end to end.

  4. 04

    Review the extracted evidence

    Every value with the page it came from and its confidence.

  5. 05

    Review what passed, failed, required data, or did not apply

    Four states, never two.

  6. 06

    Take one finding apart end to end

    Source, fact, context, policy version, calculation, finding, evidence, disposition.

  7. 07

    Compare with known QC outcomes

    Your recorded findings are the answer key. Where we disagree, your reviewer adjudicates.

  8. 08

    Record gaps and follow-up

    Misses, false alerts, time. Three numbers, agreed in advance, computed together.

Questions we expect

Ask these before you spend time on a session

If the answers are not satisfactory, the session is not worth your afternoon. We would rather you asked now.

What runs in production today, and what is still being built? We will answer this specifically rather than in general terms, and we will not describe a roadmap item in the present tense. The current capability matrix.

What have you measured? We do not publish an accuracy percentage, because we have not measured one against a stated document set that we could defend. We will tell you what we have tested, on what, and what we have not. A number without a method behind it is worth less than that answer.

What happens to our borrower documents? Answered on the security and data page before you ask. Short version: they are not training data, a third-party model does the reading, retention is contractual.

Who does the work on our side? One person who knows your QC standard, for about two hours across the session and the follow-up. We do the configuration.

What does it cost? The session and the first evaluation are unpaid. Beyond that, pricing is not a per-page fee: it reflects cloud and model consumption plus the engineering to configure your programs and rule sets, and we put a number and its basis in writing before you commit to anything.

What can three to five files tell us? Whether a larger evaluation is worth authorizing. Not portfolio accuracy, and we will not present it as though it did.

Request a working session

Tell us what you review

Two lines is enough. Tell us the file types you would bring and what you would want measured. A named person who knows the product replies with times.

We use this to reply to you and nothing else. It is not added to a marketing list, and it is not the place for borrower documents. See the privacy policy.